← Module 7 Module 7 — Psychedelics 7c: Deliriants
Submodule 7c

Deliriants

datura / jimsonweed scopolamine diphenhydramine (Benadryl) anticholinergic antihistamines

Step 1: What the Drug Does

Muscarinic acetylcholine synapse
The muscarinic ACh synapse. Deliriants occupy the mAChR binding site without activating it, blocking endogenous ACh from getting in.

Deliriants are competitive antagonists at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). They occupy the receptor without activating it — blocking endogenous acetylcholine from binding — so the cholinergic system goes dark.

There are five muscarinic subtypes (M1–M5), each in different tissues with different jobs. Most deliriants block all five non-selectively, which is why the symptom profile is so broad. The classical toxidrome comes mostly from M1, M2, and M3 blockade. The more recently appreciated psychiatric and reinforcing effects come from M4 and M5.

Mechanistically opposite to nicotine — which activates a different family of cholinergic receptors, the nicotinic ones. They share a neurotransmitter, not a mechanism.

One-line summary: Deliriants = "block acetylcholine signaling everywhere."


Step 2: What Acetylcholine Normally Does (via mAChRs)

ACh hitting muscarinic receptors does very different jobs depending on subtype and location (Eglen, 2006; Caulfield & Birdsall, 1998):

The M4/M5 balance. In the reward circuit, M4 and M5 work in opposition: M4 dampens dopamine release, M5 promotes it. Resting cholinergic tone keeps both engaged at low levels. Block them both → dopamine signaling is disrupted in a complex way that depends on which receptor was contributing more at baseline. (Some people hate it, some people love it — but most people hate it, so don't do these, they suck.)


Step 3: Where mAChRs Live

Region
Receptor
Normal Job
Hippocampus & basal forebrain
M1
Memory consolidation, sensory gating
Hippocampus
Cortex broadly
M1
Arousal regulation, attention
Cortex
Heart
M2
Vagal braking on heart rate
Smooth muscle & glands
M3
Sweat, saliva, GI motility, pupil constriction, bladder emptying
Striatum / basal ganglia
M4
Inhibits dopamine release ("dopamine brake")
Striatum / basal ganglia
VTA & substantia nigra
M5
Promotes dopamine release ("dopamine accelerator")
VTA / dopamine
Prefrontal cortex
M1 (also M4)
Working memory, executive function
Prefrontal cortex

Step 4: How Side Effects Fall Out of Steps 1–3

This is the anticholinergic toxidrome — clinicians remember it as: blind as a bat, mad as a hatter, red as a beet, hot as a hare, dry as a bone. Each piece maps to blocking a specific muscarinic job in a specific region (Broderick et al., 2023).

Classical Peripheral and CNS Toxidrome (M1, M2, M3)

Symptom
Mechanism
True hallucinations
"mad as a hatter"
Hippocampal M1 blocked → sensory gating fails → brain can't separate internal signals from external reality
Anterograde amnesia
Hippocampal M1 blocked → memory encoding fails
Tachycardia
Cardiac M2 blocked → loss of vagal brake → heart rate rises
Hyperthermia + anhidrosis
"hot as a hare," "dry as a bone"
M3 on sweat glands blocked → can't sweat → can't dump heat
Mydriasis + blurred vision
"blind as a bat"
M3 on pupillary sphincter blocked → pupil can't constrict
Urinary retention, ileus
M3 on smooth muscle blocked → bladder and gut can't contract
Flushed skin
"red as a beet"
Compensatory peripheral vasodilation as the body tries to dump heat through skin instead

Dopaminergic Effects (M4, M5)

Blocking M4 and M5 simultaneously creates a tug-of-war in the reward circuit. The net effect depends on regional balance and dose, but the documented consequences include:

Effect
Mechanism
Modest reinforcing / euphoric effects at low doses
M4 blockade removes the dopamine "brake" → dopamine release rises in NAc → mild reward signal. Diphenhydramine and other anticholinergics have measurable abuse potential despite producing unpleasant subjective effects (Halpert et al., 2008; Thomas et al., 2009).
Worsening of psychotic symptoms / contribution to delirium
M4/M5 imbalance disrupts cortical-striatal dopamine signaling → contributes to the disorganized, psychotic-like quality of deliriant intoxication beyond what M1 sensory-gating failure alone produces (Foster et al., 2021).
Movement abnormalities
M4 is the dominant muscarinic receptor in the striatum; its blockade interacts with dopaminergic signaling on motor circuits → can produce restlessness, dystonic movements, or rigidity, especially at high doses.
Long-term dementia risk (chronic use)
M1/M4 are heavily involved in cognitive function; chronic anticholinergic exposure is associated with increased dementia incidence in epidemiological studies (Cancelli et al., 2008; Coupland et al., 2019) — the M4 contribution is being actively investigated.

M4 agonists are now in late-stage clinical trials as a new class of antipsychotic — they reduce dopamine release in the mesolimbic pathway without the metabolic side effects of D2 blockers (Kaul et al., 2024; xanomeline-trospium / KarXT). M4 agonism reduces psychosis; by symmetry, M4 antagonism — what deliriants do — pushes toward psychosis-like states. The delirium is not just M1 sensory-gating failure; it has a dopaminergic component.


True Hallucinations vs. Psychedelic Hallucinations

Critical distinction. Psychedelic users typically know they are having visual distortions. Deliriant users fully believe their hallucinations are real — conversations with people who aren't there, smoking cigarettes that don't exist, believing they've gone home when they're still on the floor. This is qualitatively different and clinically much more dangerous.

The mechanism: deliriants break the sensory-gating system (M1 in hippocampus and cortex) that distinguishes internal signals from external reality, and simultaneously disrupt dopaminergic-cortical communication (M4/M5) that normally tags experiences with the right reality-status. The brain has no way to flag the hallucinations as not-real because both the perceptual filter and the reality-monitoring system are offline.


The Balancing Loop

Chronic muscarinic blockade → compensatory upregulation of mAChR density across all subtypes. Sudden discontinuation → cholinergic rebound:


User Manual

No established recreational dose — plant alkaloid concentrations vary enormously between specimens. Hallucinations are indistinguishable from reality, often leading to dangerous behavior: walking into traffic, falling from heights, attempting to "rescue" hallucinated family members. Effects can last 24–72 hours.

Two observations that M1 sensory-gating failure alone does not account for:

(If you are dependent on deliriants, please seek professional help — these carry serious long-term cognitive risks.)

If exposure has occurred (intentional or accidental), seek medical attention. Physostigmine — a cholinesterase inhibitor used in hospital settings, with its own risk profile — reverses anticholinergic toxicity in severe cases by raising synaptic acetylcholine high enough to outcompete the blocker at the receptor. Sober supervision is essential — users cannot reliably distinguish hallucinations from reality. Chronic use of anticholinergic drugs (including over-the-counter sleep aids and allergy medications) is associated with increased dementia risk in older adults; this is now a recognized clinical concern. Paradoxically, the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine has been investigated as a rapid-acting antidepressant at sub-anesthetic doses (Furey & Drevets, 2006).


Sources

  1. Bonsi, P., et al. (2011). Centrality of striatal cholinergic transmission in basal ganglia function. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2011.00006
  2. Broderick, E. D., et al. (2023). Anticholinergic toxicity. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534798/
  3. Cancelli, I., et al. (2008). Drugs with anticholinergic properties: cognitive and neuropsychiatric side-effects in elderly patients. Neurological Sciences, 29(Suppl 1), S73–S80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0901-x
  4. Caulfield, M. P., & Birdsall, N. J. (1998). International Union of Pharmacology. XVII. Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Pharmacological Reviews, 50(2), 279–290. https://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/50/2/279
  5. Coupland, C. A. C., et al. (2019). Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(8), 1084–1093. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0677
  6. Eglen, R. M. (2006). Muscarinic receptor subtypes in neuronal and non-neuronal cholinergic function. Autonomic & Autacoid Pharmacology, 26(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-8673.2006.00368.x
  7. Foster, D. J., et al. (2014). M5 receptor activation produces opposing physiological outcomes in dopamine neurons depending on the receptor's location. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(9), 3253–3262. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4896-13.2014
  8. Foster, D. J., et al. (2021). Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors as novel treatment targets for schizophrenia. Pharmacological Reviews, 73(4), 1322–1339. https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000208
  9. Furey, M. L., & Drevets, W. C. (2006). Antidepressant efficacy of the antimuscarinic drug scopolamine. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(10), 1121–1129. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1121
  10. Halpert, A. G., et al. (2008). Behavioral effects of cyclopentolate and diphenhydramine in humans. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95(1–2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.005
  11. Kaul, I., et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium chloride in schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. The Lancet, 403(10422), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02190-6
  12. Thomas, A., et al. (2009). Diphenhydramine abuse and detoxification: a brief review and case report. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 23(1), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881107083809
  13. Threlfell, S., et al. (2010). Striatal muscarinic receptors promote activity dependence of dopamine transmission via distinct receptor subtypes on cholinergic interneurons in ventral versus dorsal striatum. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(9), 3398–3408. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5620-09.2010
  14. Yeomans, J. S. (1995). Role of tegmental cholinergic neurons in dopaminergic activation, antimuscarinic psychosis and schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology, 12(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-133X(94)00054-4